Hodding Carter III

Police, judge and other officials would not be vulnerable to rotting because corruption is rooted in the punishableity of medicines and the attendant high cost of those drugs. Regulating drug mathematical product and sales would give the government control of the situation, would instantly demean prices to a level with which criminal drug-makers could not and would not compete, and corruption of officials would be over. This is an even more compelling argument when we analyse the negative impact the corruption of public officials has on the res publica in moral terms, especially on the youth of the nation. either time a TV news program or newspaper article reports police corruption, it cannot result in anything provided a further breakdown in the moral building of the individual and of the fiat as a whole. After all, if cops and judges ar corrupt, why should the average citizen behave morally, especially with reward to using il sub judice drugs? In addition, in moral terms, the citizen who is other than law-abiding, suddenly sees himself as a lawbreaker if he uses illegal drugs. This further alienates him from the society which makes such laws which he feels are not pertinent to him.

Carter writes that the illegality of drugs creates an incentive for individual Americans to participate in the drug trade because of the money involved:

The money that can be made from an illegal product that has about 23 million current users in this cou

This leaves the drug cocaine, which is generally seen today as the most troublesome drug with enjoy to law enforcement, treatment, and legalization:

This horrible set of pot is not suddenly going to get better on its own, and the current insurance policy has been shown to be impotent at best, and at worst it has an aggravating effect on the situation, driving more youngsters into a life of crime associated with drug use, sales, and related crime and violence. The war on drugs has been lost. It is time for a brand-new policy based on legalization. It is difficult to se how, overall, the problems associated with drugs would worsen by such a brave change in loving and legal policy.

Carter admits that he does not have all the answers with respect to crack cocaine, and adds that "addiction levels might increase, at least temporarily, if legal sanctions were removed" (11).

Carter concludes with the argument that the situation existing in this society as long as prohibition of drugs continues will precisely grow worse:

This question is especially vital and relevant in an increasingly conservative era in which every(prenominal) penny and dollar of public monies is analyzes as to its allocation and potency in public programs. Conservatives are inconsistent in the mesh between their moral and practical stands on this issue. The costs of increase law enforcement with respect to illegal drugs are prohibitive, and the practicality of such a policy is non-existent.

Carter addresses the alternative to legalization: an increase in efforts to cloture rugs through the courts and jails:

Another effective argument from Carter for the legalization of drugs focuses on the relative victimize done by such drugs compared to the damage done by the legal drugs of alcohol and tobacco:

Since the courts and jails are already swamped beyond capacity by the arrests that are routinely made (44,000 drug dealers and users over a two-year arrest in Washington alone), and since those
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.