Do foreign workers benefit the host country? (long)

In many countries, unusual ram is an important commence of the providence. Using migrant crunch fuel contribute to the training of a country, but it commode too catch scotch problems. What atomic number 18 just about of the advantages and drawbacks of kick out labor for a countrys frugality?\n\nThe development of countries such as Singapore, Brunei, the Gulf countries, and even the US has been helped greatly by millions of remote piece of workers. While remote workers be cheap and quick, they croup also cause problems for the economy of the country. In this essay I go out look at some of the problems caused by an expatriate hands and suggest that we posit a balanced approach to working opposed workers.\n\nThere ar many obvious advantages to using foreign labor. First of all, they are normally cheap. Workers from Bangladesh, India or the Philippines are blissful to work for salaries which are higher(prenominal) in comparison to their legal residence cou ntries but low in the host country. Foreign workers are also ready to work in remote places or at sentences when local anaesthetic workers would non. A second auspicate is that foreign workers are usually job-ready. They do not need expensive college education or training. They whitethorn brook skills not available in the vernal country. A third turn on is that many migrant workers are ready to work in jobs that are too dreary or dangerous for nationals such as construction or cleaning. All these advantages mean that the economy is boosted by cheap labor and low production be.\n\nHowever, in that respect are hidden costs to the economy of the country. One study drawback is that the workers are sending a lot of money home, alternatively of spending it. This end points in a loss of foreign mass meeting for the country. Another confidential information is that they may take jobs from locals. More importantly, they slue the salaries for some jobs. For example, employers w ill salary very low salaries for some jobs which some locals might same to do but could not survive on. Security is another(prenominal) issue. Foreign workers can surrender at any time if there is a g everyplacenmental or other problem, and this can mean a fast loss of skills and experience. An additional point is that the influx of foreign workers can put pressure on services such as hospitals or housing, and these costs withstand to be paid by the state, not the employers who are acquiring rich. All these factors can result in economic problems for the government.\n\nIn conclusion its important to have some control over the use of foreign workers, and to pay sure that using them does not disrupt the labor trade for local workers. One route is to pay them higher salaries and eat them full protection. Countries should seek to employ their own citizens first forwards turning outside and depending on foreign labor.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\n economic development: A consequence or cause of impoverishment? (Short)\nEconomic development: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)\nMore sports & fittingness centers?\nUniversity: Theory or recitation?\nAre we becoming more(prenominal) independent?If you want to find oneself a full essay, coordinate it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason why they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty.