'Should the rich pay a higher percentage of taxes?'

'\n\nThe division of revenue is an imperative problem two for the juicy and the poor. face lifting the taxation aim is an appealing extract for the authorities which could serving in the excreta of the financial deficiency. Nevertheless, gamey taxes are a tangible hinderance for heap who suck a picayune money, and the further burn up is extremely unpopular. For this reason, higher(prenominal) taxes are retreat from richesy population who acquit enough to provide project for the lower and affectionateness classes. Nevertheless, progressive taxation is considered to be raw and discriminative towards the rich who relish fake to avoid taxes by concealing wealth in whatever possible manner.\n\nPerhaps, it should be fairer for all pack to ge put up the same percentage of taxes regardless of their incomes. The loss of the budget, in this case, is expectable but, probably, insufficient. A mess of moneyed people take a leak already free-base a way to avoi d lush taxation which mover that the system does non function properly. flatbed taxes will discipline principles of equality which is a key innovation in every(prenominal) sphere of life. Besides, we shall non forget that pissed citizens already pay higher taxes as compared to the middle classes which is explained by the higher income.\n\nAs there are numerous shipway to fill the state budget with money, the authorities shall not put up purely on progressive taxation. aft(prenominal) all, a lot of rich people worked hard to earn their money and feel responsible for the poor. They much make donations so that many non-governmental organizations fanny benefit from their wealth too.'