The choice amidst a crown of thorns and traditional governing body will have a huge impact on managerial authority and control. In the traditional system, the chief operating officers words take precedence. He decides the insurance policy and managers must do their best to meet the requirements set let out by the CEO as he is the decision pull outr. Yes, the managers atomic number 18 responsible in advising the CEO but they be not the decision makers. In a crossbred system, this becomes the opposite. Since much of the responsibilities as well as accountability for each independent line of credit unit are delegated to the managers, it is up to them to create policies to make the logical argument unit much profitable. Though I would say managerial authority is increased, in some cases I would say managerial control decreases. After all in a hybrid unit, you are trying to create a flatter system within the smaller business units where employees are able to make more decisions and adapt to change faster.
Though Jones claims there are more managers in a tall organization than a flat one (Jones 2010, p. 393), I am inclined to protest with him. I dont believe there are more or less managers required in a hybrid versus the traditional system. The overall chain of command dust unchanged as managers must still report to the CEO and employees must report to the manager. What I do believe the hybrid system does is allow for a more independent vary and efficient manager as well as employees; however, the chain of command and the hierarchy remains the same. This is the creation of rational-legal leaders. The managers are more independent but they are still responsible to a higher authority, the CEO...If you want to get a full essay, put together it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment