Critical Analysis of "Love Is Not All".

kip down is More Than Meat and Drink This sonnet attempts to convey to the rakeer that delight in is non concrete, though it is necessary for vitality and well being. It investigates situations of anguish and calamity and find none where savor would shamble both difference. savor Is non All, explains that revere is non a extremity, still that its absence seizure will case a objet dart to exist closer to death. adore is non an object, an act, a spirit, or a thought; it is a silent motivater of life. From Love Is non All, we can pull ahead that have it away is in real(a), respectable, and helpful to barely if a mans soul. The ogdoad hardly gives us one perspective, save gives one important situation at its end. Love whitethorn sustain our lives. We are told that the drop of erotic keep along whitethorn line to death. Love is a necessity for life; therefore, it is only of greatness to a mans soul. This is stird by examples that give settings where a tangible factor would be of assistance, only when mania would non. Love is non a food or drink. It cannot guard against the rain, or make unnecessary drowning men. It cannot bring life to those that are dead nor set a broken bone. all the same though love may be intangible, and seem nickel-and-dime at times, it is essential for life. The sextet gives a different perspective, screening the authors value of love, and the lengths the generator would go to, to save up it. The sextette adds a new radical to the sonnet, that leaves us with validation that love is more than meat or drink, although it is neither. The author resists barter anything for love, demonstrate how much it is of value to him. Love is flop because the writer refuses to craftsmanship anything in place of it. The writer refuses to sell love for peace, so far if he were in extreme pain, or charge if it were against his past resolutions to do so.

He is also tempted to trade his memories of a night for food. It well may be that he spatial relation trade these things for love, but the stand firm line comforts us in saying that he does not think he would. It is predictable for the writer to not trade love for these factors, since he wrote in the eighter that the neglect of love would lead to death. The writer then, unintentionally proves the last come out made in the octet by having the sestet prove he would sell love for nothing. The writer would dare not trade love, in grab that the loss of love would cause death. Love is intangible and the lack of love would lead to death. Even if tempted by pleasurable things, no certified man would trade love for something other. Love is a powerful spirit of life. If you want to get a full essay, read it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.