In order to meet the "Summit"" goals for the disadvantaged, it is scratch line necessary to identify who these students are; and a good jazz of research has been conducted to this end. This research is discussed by Liebert and Wicks-Nelson (1981) who state that the disadvantage are those who:
. . .are economically poor. The disadvantaged child is a product of poverty--or more than accurately is caught up in the self-perpetuating cycle of poverty and failure. (p.348)
Liebert and Wicks-Nelson (1981) withal point out that the poor tend to be to a fault represented by ethnic minorities such as Blacks and Hispanics, and American Indians. For example, Blacks comprise about 11 percent of the American population, further 127 percent of those living at or at a cut back place the positive poverty line. People living at or below the poverty line tend to occupy the least in demand(predicate) jobs in American society.
Directly relevant to this ingest is the particular that the disadvantaged tend to be those students least successful in school. For example, Liebert and Wicks-Nelson (1981) report that the lower children's socioeconomic status, the less likely it is that they are performing at or over their year level. Regarding minorities in particular, the authors report that Blacks tend to be a full grade leve
By the end of the principal(a) grades, students are set into rigid ability tracks correlating to their race and socioeconomic status. The effects last even presbyopicer than the school years. slightly new research hints that the problem may not be the tracking structure itself, but how individuals use it and react to it. (p.10).
Because register Analysis is non-experimental in nature, it is not appropriate, technically speaking, to refer to the variables of the study in terms of their being independent and dependent factors. However, for purposes of elucidating appreciation of the relationships of interest, these terms can be used so long as their limited application is kept in mind.
maybe because of schooling difficulties, level of education (an often cited index of school success) has been observed to be linearly related to socioeconomic status. Specifically, the lower the socioeconomic status of stems, the fewer the number of college graduates in the group; this regardless of intelligence levels. In the lower socioeconomic categories, and about 20 percent of the noble intelligence students are college graduates whereas in the higher socioeconomic categories, 64 percent of the high intelligence students are college graduates.
Brown, F.G. (1976). Principles of educational and psychological testing (2nd ed.) NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment