Cultural explanations fuddle also been provided to explain the decline in homicide. McCaghy, et al. cite the work of Donohoe and Levitt (127), who imagine that legalized stillbirth has reduced crime in general and miscarriage in particular. That makes sense if one accepts the idea that fewer unloved pregnancies and babies pr aftermath murders since most murders " are committed by persons introduce with their victims" (128). Wanted children are also more likely to have positive family experiences and non grow up in poverty, with disorganised parental arrangements, such as unemployed single mothers, and disorganised social arrangements that are implied by the birth of unwanted babies. In that way cultural and economic explanations of the homicide rate seem to merge.
The abortion explanation is bound to give support to those who view women's reproductive rights as a social good. Despite that, there is one weakness of the abortion explanation: It is hard to prove that what did non happen caused the homicide decline. This can be explained by the logical delusion called post hoc, ergo propter
The strength of the economic argument lies in facts that can positively be identified. Statistics show that murder mainly takes place among economically separate people. That idea is concordant with the functionalist analysis of bon ton, particularly by Emile Durkheim. Durkheim views society as the sum total or "integration" (Swingewood 226) of several(a) complex interacting forces. However, the social structures that shape individual and social-unit lives do non always enable everybody to participate in the benefits of society. Durkheim's term for omit of unity or social disarray is anomie, or individual failure to integrate with the highly demanding power and structure of industrial society (Durkheim 258).
In Durkheim's theory, anomie is dysfunctional, and such elements "tend to operate institutionalised or resolved" (Swingewood 233). In other words, the clay absorbs dysfunction, and adapts it to general social functioning.
Durkheim, Emile. The Division of Labor in Society. Trans. W.D. Halls. naked as a jaybird York: The Free P, 1984.
The whole matter is further complicated by the easy access to guns, which can quickly escalate the frenzy of a given situation. Meanwhile, there is the culture of gun-ownership advocacy, which argues the right to meet arms as a constitutional right. Gun-ownership advocates maintain that people, not guns, kill people. The fact that such a technical claim has nothing to do with the profound effectiveness of guns as weapons (McCaghy 140) and does not critique the culture of violence that it acknowledges seems to be overlooked by such advocates. McCaghy, et al., say that "the two sides of the gun issue are miles apart" (146). They are also unlikely to be reconciled.
hoc, "the monstrous idea that if event B happened after event A, it happened because of event A" (Fischer 166). Even though the abortion explanation is consistent with the decline in homicide rates, that does not prove that the two phenomena are connected.
With these factors
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment